Log In | Register
As a political observer in 2012 and fully believing that we need at least two viable political parties to assure that a full discussion of public policy takes place, With that said, it takes two rational parties for productive discussions. Again, as an observer it appears the Republican Party now fits the definition below which precludes any productive discussion to take place between the two parties.
R = Reactionary (opposed to progressive social or political change)
E = Evangelical (enthusiastic or zealous in support of a particular cause and very eager to make other people share its beliefs or ideals)
P = Pious (characterized by a hypocritical concern with virtue or religious devotion; sanctimonious.)
U = Unyielding (not giving in to persuasion, pressure, or force)
B = Brazen (expressing boldness and a complete lack of shame)
L = Listless (lacking energy, interest, or the willingness to make an effort)
I= Ideologists (a person advocating a particular ideology)
C = Chauvinistic (militant devotion to and glorification of one's country; fanatical patriotism)
A = Angry (feeling or showing anger or strong resentment)
N= Narcissists (a person who is overly self-involved, and often vain and selfish)
We did not add the (S) to Republican as for some reason it seemed like playing T'ball. Each of readers may suggest though if you wish. Here we will get you started: (Sanctimonious, selfish, self-serving, .......) You are on your own from here.
T1Truth
It is easy and Free, Join Newsvine Now:
